A new study released on Tuesday finds that streaming services like Netflix and Hulu are more affordable than traditional cable television and satellite services.
The study, published by consulting firm Avalere Health, examined the costs and benefits of both services and concluded that the “Netflix versus Hulu” comparison is misleading.
The study surveyed more than 4,000 consumers in a number of U.S. states, and found that people who stream content from both services reported similar costs to cable TV and satellite, but Hulu offered a lower price tag.
The data also showed that the average cost of a Netflix subscription was $2.50 per month and that the Hulu service offered better coverage of video quality and streaming options.
However, Avalere noted that the study did not take into account the price of content streaming and did not include the cost of subscription fees or other expenses that can vary from service to service.
The report also found that while Hulu’s pricing structure was less expensive than Netflix, its streaming service was more expensive than other streaming services.
In addition, Netflix and YouTube video had a higher average cost per subscriber, while Spotify, Hulu Plus, and YouTube TV all had lower average costs per subscriber.
However the Avalere study does not take streaming into account other costs, like cable and satellite bills, which are much higher than streaming costs.
According to Avalere, people who subscribe to Netflix or Hulu pay an average of $4,958 per year.
However, people with other cable or satellite bills paid an average $3,827 per year on average, the study found.
The Avalere report also notes that people also pay a premium for sports streaming services, including ESPN and HBO.
Avalere found that those sports services are more expensive for people who have a subscription to sports networks like ESPN, ESPN2, and MLB Network.
According to Avalé, the median monthly cost of Hulu Plus is $1,837, while for ESPN it is $2,891.
Avaliere also found there was no difference in cost between Spotify and YouTube, as both services offered similar services for a similar price.
However Avalere does not consider the cost savings for content streaming or other services that are cheaper for the consumer, like subscription fees, or add-ons.
This is because most streaming services don’t include such costs in their pricing, and thus do not affect the cost per stream.
However in this case, the Avalé study finds that the difference in the cost between Netflix and Spotify is negligible, as the average monthly cost for Hulu Plus was $1.75, compared to $2 for Spotify.
In this case it is unclear if Hulu Plus’s lower cost is because of the low cost of the service, or because the difference between Spotify’s and Hulu’s streaming prices is not as great as the difference for other streaming products.